Table 2 Performance Evaluation of the Proposed Model Against Classical Rod Theory and Biomechanical Growth Model Across Different Growth Conditions
From: Coconut tree modeling based on abiotic factors and modified cosserat rod theory
Tree growth | Characteristics | Coconut tree type | MAE (Classical vs Proposed) | RMSE (Classical vs Proposed) | RÂ2 (Classical vs Proposed) | MAE (Biomechanical vs Proposed) | RMSE (Biomechanical vs Proposed) | RÂ2 (Biomechanical vs Proposed) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Temporal | WCT | 758.3 | 758.3 | 0.094756 | 59.6 | 59.6 | 0.632392 |
CGD | 528.7 | 528.7 | 0.101939 | 38.6 | 38.6 | 0.675873 | ||
Spatial | WCT | 263.2 | 263.2 | 0.073224 | 98.1 | 98.1 | 0.179495 | |
CGD | 120.5 | 120.5 | 0.103981 | 33.5 | 33.5 | 0.308998 | ||
Secondary | Temporal | WCT | 448.1 | 448.1 | 0.10403 | 707 | 707 | 0.067904 |
CGD | 260.5 | 260.5 | 0.126968 | 439.6 | 439.6 | 0.078333 | ||
Spatial | WCT | 115.7 | 115.7 | 0.658543 | 595.7 | 595.7 | 0.228038 | |
CGD | 98.3 | 98.3 | 0.722784 | 635 | 635 | 0.229468 |