Skip to main content

Table 1 Details of H-RT-DETR and the compared methods

From: Plant recognition of maize seedling stage in UAV remote sensing images based on H-RT-DETR

Methods

Backbone

Optimizer

Pre-trained

Hyperparameters for training

YOLOv5

CSPDarknet53

SGD

False

Learning rate:initial was 0.001, min was 0.00001,delay type was cos

YOLOv7

CSPDarknet53

SGD

False

Learning rate:initial was 0.001, min was 0.00001,delay type was cos

YOLOv8

CSPDarknet53

SGD

False

Learning rate:initial was 0.001, min was 0.00001,delay type was cos

YOLOX

CSPDarknet53

SGD

False

Learning rate:initial was 0.001, min was 0.00001,delay type was cos

RT-DETR

PResNet

AdamW

False

Encoder:HybridEncoder(in_channels:[512, 1024, 2048],feat_strides:[8, 16, 32], hidden_dim = 256,nhead = 8,activation function ='gelu')

Decoder:RTDETRTransformer(feat_channels: [256, 256, 256],feat_strides: [8, 16, 32], hidden_dim = 256,num_levels = 3,num_queries = 300,num_decoder_layers: 6,num_denoising: 100)

H-RT-DETR

HFR

AdamW

False

Encoder:HybridEncoder(in_channels:[512, 1024, 2048],feat_strides:[8, 16, 32], hidden_dim = 256,nhead = 8,activation function ='gelu')

Decoder:RTDETRTransformer(feat_channels: [256, 256, 256],feat_strides: [8, 16, 32], hidden_dim = 256,num_levels = 3,num_queries = 300,num_decoder_layers: 6,num_denoising: 100)